|
RAJGOPAL NIDAMBOOR
It's not unusual for first-time writers/authors
to turn to a vanity publisher, especially when they just can't
get their work published by mainstream publishers. A reflection
on the tizzy concept, which is gaining new ground
everywhere.
Vanity publishing offers a "plausible" solution
-- to getting published -- though, in today's writing world,
the trend seems to be a-changin'. More and more authors, who
don't hit the "print-rap" with a regular "publisher,"
often self-publish. Besides, quite a few of them have also
made it big, when a major imprint has taken up their originally
self-published title, down the line, and published it under
its own imprint.
The reason is simple -- there's no need
to search the horizons for an answer. How often have we not
heard of good manuscripts not being accepted by mainstream
publishers -- on grounds other than merit alone? Also, it is
not that books that have been published, by them, have all
been literary, or estimable, signposts. Many of the much-hyped
books have bombed; there have been many more that have had
nothing but thrash published between their pages.
So far as pure self-publishing is concerned,
the author himself/herself does everything -- from writing,
editing, proofreading, including marketing. S/he may, of course,
outsource the essentials like DTP, designing, printing/distribution,
and so on. But, that's what many small publishers themselves
offer and do, just as well, today.
Unlike a purely self-publishing venture,
vanity, or subsidy, presses often call themselves by other
names, including "self", "joint-venture",
or "co-operative" publishing, and ask for a "contribution"
to cover costs. There lies the catch. Most vanity publishers
make money not by selling books, but by charging the client
as much as possible ["co-operation"] to print as
few copies of a book as they can, without giving much thought
to marketing
However, you just cannot generalise all
vanity publishers as "sly" -- there maybe exceptions.
This depends on your luck -- if you want to get published, anyway,
by them.
Maybe, writers who wish to get so published
need to look at vanity publishing as a hobby -- one that may
provide "professional" copies of a book, and not
make them great writers, or help them build careers in writing [That's what you've vanity publishing for! And, also, because,
no mainstream publisher advertises/calls for books/submissions,
and charges you a fee!].
Now, the nitty-gritty of it all. Vanity
publishing is a service in which authors are charged to have
their work published. Unlike mainstream publishing houses,
which reject many more manuscripts than they publish, some
vanity publishers print work, regardless of quality. They most
often claim, that, submissions have been read by "in-house"
readers and/or approved by their "editor/s," sans
documentary evidence. Most authors would, of course, buy the
idea -- not as "flattery," but as gospel, even truth.
After all, "writers" want to be pampered -- and,
subsidy publishers know how to just do it best.
Says a first-time published author -- B
K -- who wishes to maintain his anonymity. "I contacted
a vanity publisher to get my work of fiction published. I
was told to send my MS, in its entirety, for their reading.
I soon got a response -- they'd found the book 'worthy of publication.'
We signed a contract, which said that they would take it up
as soon as the 'specific' fee was received. I was quite happy,
and duly sent them the amount
It was, of course, a different
thing that I'd not read between the lines -- 'they'd give me
no guarantee of sale.' [Nobody does]. They also indicated
that they would stand by my book, to the best extent possible
-- through a launch, if I could afford it, and also send review
copies to the press."
He adds: "The book was appropriately
published with an attractive cover. I was more than pleased.
However, I have, so far, not received my royalty payment --
on the sale of copies per se. Worse still, I have not seen
copies of the book displayed at the local bookshops I've visited
-- not just in my town, but elsewhere. Besides, I have also
asked friends to check out, wherever possible. I have, until
now, drawn a blank."
Another vanity-published writer notes
that she received a pittance as royalty -- on a few dozen copies,
which her publisher reported he'd sold. This happened six
months after the book was published. It's now two years, and
she's yet to receive a penny
Besides, it's only after
repeated inquiries that her publisher told her that he had
not received statement/s from his distributor; and, that the
book was "moving too slowly."
This, says an insider
in the book trade business, is a commonplace strategy -- a
great way to buy time, and keep the heat off. More so, because
most authors won't be as demanding as the consumer at a retail
outlet -- or, they may not have exact details of the print-run, or get their hands on the precise number of copies sold.
They are, quite simply, contented that their work has seen
the light of the day -- and, made them "authors."
There's more to vanity publishing than
what meets the word in print. Some vanity publishers state,
or imply, that they share production costs with the author.
This is far from the truth -- unless you've a genuine invoice/inventory.
The first victim, in most cases, therefore, is transparency!
You believe your so-called publisher, because you've no other
choice.
That's not all. With vanity publishing,
your writing doesn't improve. You don't have the services
of [good] editors, artists etc., out there -- unlike mainstream
publishing, where many, many hours are spent on the editorial/aesthetic
attributes of any given work. Inference? The only guys that
make merry, and laugh their way to the bank, for doing almost
nothing are vanity publishers, thanks to our own lack of sanity!
More importantly, vanity presses often
claim that "so-and-so," quite often a celebrity,
made it big through subsidy publishing -- which isn't quite
true. You've names of self-published/vanity writers who have
become best-selling authors, down the line -- with mainstream
book publishing. But, one cardinal fact remains. No vanity
book has ever been nominated for an award, much less the Booker
Prize! Also, nobody ever wants a vanity press author to win
commendations, much less read him/her. There hangs a tale
-- quite transcendent
[However, it's entirely a different
matter if you were a corporate bigwig. You'd push your book
down unwilling "throats" -- or, get someone who wants
business, to lift copies, at a discounted price, for usage
as corporate gift/s, and so on].
But, that's the way it is -- at the stakes.
And, there's nothing you could do except beat a primal grouse.
Which is also one reason why vanity writers are not so fastidious
about getting "royalties." They simply can't. Because,
nobody is ever going to lap up a book written by them a la
a best-seller from mainstream publishers, although there are
a few choicer "commissions" for the "compulsive"
vanity author, who wants his/her ego to soar -- in the esteem
of friends, family, and inner circle, not to speak of their
bookshelves, or drawing room centre tables -- to the seventh
heaven of one's existence!
To look at vanity publishing -- differently.
Expression, after all, is a fundamental right. Well, if somebody
wants to publish his/her own book, all by oneself, or through
a subsidy press, there's nothing one could do about it. Also,
if someone is well off, and doesn't mind to spend money from
his/her own pocket, why not? The latter, for sure, does not
make a living by writing books. Also, in most cases, the books
are given away as complimentary copies, or the proceeds --
if any -- go for a cause, maybe charity. If this isn't a kind
of social service, an add-on "bonus" -- which could
get you a mention in the local newspapers -- what is?!
Vanity publishing isn't a foreign phenomenon.
It's growing in India too, despite the fact that many such
publishing houses, especially abroad, which also "engineer"
the "business of dubious publishing" in this country,
have shut shop because of gross cheating, and "manoeuvres"
of the worst order, thanks to legal battles. Needless to say,
too, some first-time authors have lost huge sums of money,
and, perhaps, their life's savings, trying to "piggy-ride"
on their backs to success, or stardom, or to fulfilling a
dream -- and, failed miserably in their thoughtless attempts.
Deduction: authors beware about subsidy
publishing! Maybe, it's better to self-publish, with adequate
professional help -- from freelance editors to designers, and
printers, and distributors -- if you'd afford costs, and wait
for a leading imprint to "lap" up the title, down
the line. But, one thing is imperative: make sure that your
work is worthy, well-written, and meets the demands of would-be
readers. Also, remember, you'd sell, or help sell a not-so-good
book, with a few USPs in tow -- not on the basis of your "vanity"
alone -- even if you've everything that goes to making you
a "saleable" author, with celebrity/corporate friends,
book launches, author-signing sessions, media coverage etc.,
The premise is simple. If your book
cannot make it to the readers' or book lovers' podium, on its
own steam -- nothing else will.
|